Legal Opinion

In re Willowell Foundation Conditional Use Certificate of Occupancy (Andrew Higbee, Jr. and Sheryl Knauth, Appellants)

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 29, 2016No. 2014-369PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.

¶ 1. Willowell Foundation received a conditional-use permit to build a community center and related improvements on a large plot of land in the Town of Monkton. Neighbors challenge the permit. They argue the project violates a subdivision condition mandating agricultural use, claim additional failings of Willowell’s application, and contend the Superior Court, Environmental Division, erred in several ways in upholding the permit approval. We affirm.

¶ 2. Willowell’s 229.8-acre plot is located in Monkton’s Medium Density Rural Agricultural Zoning District (RA 2 MD) and is subject to the Unified…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Isbrandtsen v. North Branch Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  2. In Re Stowe Club HighlandsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  3. Appeal of WeeksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  4. In Re HandySupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  5. In Re Appeals of GarenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re Confluence Behavioral Health, LLC Conditional Use to Operate a Therapeutic Community Residence Program (Jason Albert, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  2. In re Hinesburg Hannaford Act 250 PermitSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  3. 1417 Joes Brook Road CU Permit Application - Decision on MeritsVermont Superior Court · 2025
  4. Andreen CU Permit - Decision on the MeritsVermont Superior Court · 2018
  5. Clark CU Appeal & Clark Accessory Use Appeal - Decision on MeritsVermont Superior Court · 2025

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API