Legal Opinion

Gallipo v. City of Rutland

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 29, 2005No. 04-041PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

¶ 1. Plaintiff, Raymond Gallipo, appeals a superior court order granting summary judgment to defendant, City of Rutland, on plaintiff’s retaliatory discrimination claims, and defendant appeals the court’s order dismissing its unjust enrichment counterclaim. Plaintiff argues that the court erred in (1) accepting defendant’s requests to admit as fact and denying plaintiff a renewed chance to respond; (2) admitting defendant’s statement of undisputed facts in its summary judgment motion for plaintiff’s failure to comply with Rule 56(c)(2); and (3) determining that collateral estoppel applied to…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Cynthia A. Richardson v. New York State Department of Correctional Service, Auburn Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Illinois Graphics Co. v. NickumIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Robertson v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. David A. Gauthier v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. f/k/a Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  2. Lamell Lumber Corp. v. Newstress International, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  3. Lamell Lumber Corp. v. NEWSTRESS INTERN.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  4. Webb v. LeClairSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. Smith v. DesautelsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API