Taylor v. Armiger Body Shop
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Short, Vice Chancellor:
I first note that the complaint seeks no relief as against defendant Rachelli, nor does the evidence warrant any relief against him. Judgment in his favor must, therefore, be entered.
Plaintiff brings this action to compel defendant, Armiger Body Shop to transfer and deliver to him the title certificate evidencing ownership of a certain 1960 Ford Falcon automobile. The facts are these: On September 30, 1960 plaintiff purchased the aforementioned vehicle from Ray Hitchens, a dealer in used automobiles, for the price of $1,995. Part of the purchase price was paid in cash,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leitch v. Sanford Motor Truck Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Associates Discount Corporation v. HardestyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Gaub v. MosherNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
- E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. LairdCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1939
- Oldham v. CooperCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1877
3Cited by4 opinions
- F.E. Myers Co. v. Pipe Maintenance Services, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1984
- Glass v. Southern Wrecker SalesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
- Taylor v. Armiger Body ShopCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1961
- Facciolo v. State Division of RevenueSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976