Legal Opinion

Gaub v. Mosher

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 3, 1925PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Buchaa'Aa, Y. C.

The facts as proven by the evidence are that defendant, Mrs. Mosher, was the owner of a certain Flint touring car, which she sold to one Sharp, an agent or dealer in cars of that make, in part payment for a new sedan. Delivery was made and title passed to Sharp, but the original bill of sale was in defendant’s safe deposit box and was not contemporaneously assigned or delivered, defendant promising Sharp she would get it out in a few days and deliver it to him. Sharp thereupon sold the car to complainant, telling him these facts. Complainant before paying for the car went to…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Braham & Co. v. Steinard-Hannon Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Velkers v. Glens Falls Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  3. Moore v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. Martin v. NagerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  5. Ethridge v. Allied Equipment & Supply Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API