Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Armiger Body Shop

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided May 26, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

172 A.2d 572 (1961)

Lowell H. TAYLOR, Plaintiff,

v.

ARMIGER BODY SHOP, and/or Biagio Rachelli, Defendants.

Court of Chancery of Delaware, Sussex.

May 26, 1961.

Paul R. Reed, Georgetown, for plaintiff.

Everett F. Warrington, Georgetown, for defendants.

SHORT, Vice Chancellor.

I first note that the complaint seeks no relief as against defendant Rachelli, nor does the evidence warrant any relief against him. Judgment in his favor must, therefore, be entered.

Plaintiff brings this action to compel defendant, Armiger Body Shop to transfer and deliver to him the title certificate evidencing ownership of a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Leitch v. Sanford Motor Truck Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Associates Discount Corporation v. HardestyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  3. Gaub v. MosherNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  4. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. LairdCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1939
  5. Oldham v. CooperCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. F.E. Myers Co. v. Pipe Maintenance Services, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1984
  2. Glass v. Southern Wrecker SalesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
  3. Facciolo v. State Division of RevenueSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API