Legal Opinion
Deering, Milliken & Co. v. Temp-Resisto Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 22, 1960No. Nos. 195, 196, Dockets 25200, 25201PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Temp-Resisto Corporation and Samuel Kaplan & Sons, Inc. (appellants) appeal from a judgment in favor of Deering, Milliken & Co. Inc. (appellee) sustaining the validity of Patents Nos. 2,630,620 and 2,630.573, issued March 10, 1953. The product involved is a fabric coated with metallic material and known as “Milium,” produced by plaintiff under an agreement with the patentee, H. J. Rand. Defendants’ product, “Temp-Resisto,” was found to have infringed. The district court enjoined its further manufacture during the term of the patents and awarded damages, the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Dow Chemical Co. v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Studiengesellschaft Kohle, M.B.H., Director Max Planck, Institut Fur Kohlenforschung, Hercules IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- International Latex Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent v. Warner Brothers Company, Defendant-Respondent-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Standard Coil Products Co., Inc. v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Audio Devices, Inc. v. Armour Research Foundation of Illinois Institute of TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Promega Corp. v. Novagen, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.