Legal Opinion
Carver v. Bonds
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 29, 2005No. A108129, A108923PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MUNTER, J. *
Andrew L. Carver sued the Hearst Corporation, which publishes the San Francisco Chronicle newspaper, Chronicle reporters Mark Fainaru-Wada and Ulysses Torassa (the corporation and the reporters are hereafter referred to collectively as the Newspaper), San Francisco Giant Barry Bonds, and former San Francisco 49er Roger Craig for defamation and interference with prospective economic advantage based on statements in a Chronicle article. Plaintiff appeals from the order granting defendants’ motions to strike under the anti-SLAPP law (strategic lawsuit against public…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hutchinson v. ProxmireSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Wong v. JingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Overstock.com, Inc. v. Gradient Analytics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Hawran v. HixsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Bently Reserve LP v. PapalioliosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Britts v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.