Legal Opinion

Ghezzi v. Holly

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 1970No. Docket 6,194PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, P. J.

This appeal requires interpretation of a few, relatively simple words. They are these.

“At the trial or upon the hearing of a motion or an interlocutory proceeding, any part or all of a deposition, so far as admissible under the rules of evidence, may be used against any party who was present or represented at the taking of the deposition or who had due notice thereof, in accordance with any one of the following provisions:
“(1) Any deposition may be used by any party for the purpose of impeaching the testimony of deponent as a witness.
“(2) The deposition of a party or anyone who at the time of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ruhala v. RobyMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Miller v. TolesMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Brown v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Farrell v. HazeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Rogers v. KeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. CarsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Soutear v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1986
  3. Keen v. PrisinzanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Smith v. WoronoffMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Dunn v. NundkumarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API