Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Kee

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1912No. Docket No. 40PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error to Delta; Flannigan, J. Case by Abraham Rogers against David N. Nee for malpractice. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteers, J.

This action is brought to recover damages from defendant, a physician, for alleged malpractice in neglecting to properly diagnose a fracture of the neck of the left femur, when professionally called to attend plaintiff, and for unskillful and negligent treatment of the same. Plaintiff recovered a judgment for $1,000 on the verdict of a jury in the circuit court of Delta county, and the cause is brought here by defendant on writ of error.

There are 12 assignments of error, only 2 of which are relied upon and argued by defendant, each presenting practically the same question, being that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wood v. BarkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Farrell v. HazeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Spaulding v. BlissMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Chase v. NelsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Church v. PeralesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  3. Roberson v. CounselmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. Ramberg v. MorganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. Falcon v. Memorial HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API