Legal Opinion

Stott v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 24, 2006No. 26748PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIP R. GARRISON, Judge.

Danny Bill Stott (“Movant”) appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his post-conviction motion, filed pursuant to Rule 29.15. 1 He had been convicted by a jury of one count of statutory sodomy pursuant to Section 566.062 and two counts of child molestation pursuant to Section 566.067. He was sentenced to fifteen years on statutory sodomy and ten years on both child molestation counts, to run concurrently. Movant appealed the conviction and sentences which were affirmed by this court in a written order. See State v. Stott, No. 24083 (S.D. filed August…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  3. Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  4. Wright v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Cravens v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Collins v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Hufford v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Jeffrey J. Deleon v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API