Legal Opinion

Hufford v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 2006No. 27279PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIP R. GARRISON, Judge.

Darrell Eugene Hufford (“Movant”) appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his post-conviction motion, filed pursuant to Rule 29.15. 1 Movant claims his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to call two witnesses whose testimony would have contradicted the State’s theory and supported Movant’s defense. We affirm.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence at trial revealed the following. Lorissa Henson (“Lorissa”) and her husband (collectively referred to as “the Hensons”) owned a house in Butler County, Missouri. The Hensons, who…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  3. Leisure v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  4. Hutchison v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  5. Anderson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Gleason v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Montrell Moore, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API