Legal Opinion

State v. Maher

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 6, 1985No. CC83-976; CA A31394PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

The state appeals a pre-trial order suppressing evidence of witness identifications from a photographic display and evidence seized under a search warrant issued on the basis of those identifications. Defendant cross-appeals the trial court’s failure to suppress in-court identifications by persons to whom the display was shown and all evidence taken as a result of defendant’s arrest. We reverse on appeal and affirm on cross-appeal.

The victim in this second-degree assault case was stabbed in the back about 11:30 p.m. on October 31,1983. The assailant stabbed the victim while running past him.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. LowryOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. ClassenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. State v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  2. State v. RectorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. State v. MackeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. State v. DELATORRE-VARGASCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API