Legal Opinion

State v. Gordon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 12, 1984No. 82122900; CA A30684PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*323VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions on two counts of possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4). He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of warrantless searches of his vehicle and its contents. We affirm.

An undercover deputy sheriff bought drugs from Metzker, the owner of a truck rental agency in Albany. Metzker told the deputy that he was expecting a shipment of cocaine from Eugene that day. He intended to sell some of it to the deputy. Later, deputies obtained a warrant to search Metzker’s office for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. AAA Fencing Co. v. Raintree Development & Energy Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. KostaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. State v. TetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. State v. MaherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. State v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API