Legal Opinion

Woods v. Matlock

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1897No. 2,313PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Rush Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

— This was a claim against the estate of Lewis J. Offutt, deceased. The appellant’s demurrer to the second and third paragraphs severally of the complaint or statement of claim, for want of sufficient facts, was overruled. In the second paragraph it was alleged that the decedent “is indebted to”' the claimant “in the sum of $2,500.00, which sum decedent received from his mother, Mary H. Offutt, who was the grandmother of this claimant, on or about the —— day of June, 1890, which sum the decedent agreed to hold in trust for this claimant until his death, and then he was to cause the same to be…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Taggart v. TevannyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Roehl v. HaumesserIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Hileman v. HilemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Price v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Walker v. HellerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Estate of Stanley v. PenceIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Caldwell v. UlshIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Williams v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Taber v. ZehnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Raper v. American Tin-Plate Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API