Legal Opinion

Roehl v. Haumesser

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1888No. 13,062PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.

Barbara Haumesser filed a claim against the estate of John Farner, late of Fayette county, deceased, on which a jury, after hearing the evidence, allowed her the-sum of $3,050.

The claim is based on the following facts, which are set forth in detail and at length in a complaint which was duly filed: In October, 1884, Farner resided at Connersville,, Indiana, his family consisting of himself and wife, both of whom were aged and in infirm health. Being childless, he addressed a letter to the claimant’s mother, she being a niece, residing at Madison, Indiana, in which he proposed, in effect,,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Wallace v. LongIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Mead v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  3. Sutton v. HaydenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. Wills v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Newton v. . BronsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1856

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Lowe v. TurpieIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Tewksbury v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Howe v. WatsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  5. Oles v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API