Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Ulsh

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1916No. 23,096PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From Kosciusko Circuit Court: Francis E. Bowser, Judge. Action by Eliza M. TJlslL on a claim against the estate of Isaac Caldwell, deceased. From a judgment for plaintiff, William Caldwell, executor of the last will of decedent, appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1394 Burns 1914, Acts 1901 p. 565.)

1Opinion of the CourtErwin, J.

This action arose upon a claim filed by appellee against the estate of Isaac Caldwell, deceased. Upon trial by jury appellee was awarded the 'sum of $888.11 with an order to pay the same out of the assets of the estate. There is no- question presented here as to the validity of the claim, but it is contended by appellant that the statute of limitations bars appellee’s right toa recovery and in that regard that the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial based on the grounds that the verdict of the jury is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is contrary to law. Some questions…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Massie v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Thomas v. MerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Dorsey Machine Co. v. McCaffreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Cox v. ArnsmannIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Estate of Stanley v. PenceIndiana Supreme Court · 1903

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. First Bank & Tr. Co., Etc., Extr. v. TellsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Barker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Mills v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Ayres v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Ballard v. Drake's EstateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API