Legal Opinion

Stringent v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1997No. 1868 C.D. 1997PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAHERTY, Judge.

Presently before this court is Joseph Stringent’s (Claimant) petition for review from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board).1 The Board affirmed an order of the Unemployment Compensation Referee denying benefits. We affirm.

The Board made the following findings of fact:

1. For purposes of this appeal, the claimant last worked as a plant employee for Sani-Dairy [ (Employer) ] and his last day of work was July 31,1996.

2. The claimant worked under a collective bargaining agreement (Contract) between the employer and the United Steelworkers of America,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Philco Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Penn Hills School District v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Bowman v. DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOUR.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Hussey Copper Ltd. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. In Re Estate of SagelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. B. Ciena v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. B.L. Witmer v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API