Legal Opinion
Philco Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 9, 1968No. Appeal, No. 405PublishedCited by 113 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb.. Justice Roberts,
The narrow question presented by this appeal is whether a work stoppage which began on April 27, 1964 at the Philadelphia plant of appellee (Philco Corporation) was the result of a strike or a “lock-out”, as the latter term is used in the Act of December 5, 1936, P. L. (1937) 2897, §402, as amended, 43 P.S. §802(d). Under this statute an employee is not eligible for unemployment compensation pursuant to a work stoppage flowing from a labor dispute, unless that stoppage was caused by a lock-out. Since we hold that the work stoppage here involved was the result of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Progress Manufacturing Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Department of Labor & Industry v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Stillman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Hogan Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- Odgers v. Com., Unemp. Comp. Bd. of Rev.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Kelley v. TYK Refractories Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Fairview School District v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Hercules, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.