Legal Opinion

Butzgy v. Town of Glastonbury

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 7, 1987No. 12821PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDannehy, J.

On appeal, the plaintiffs challenge the dismissal of their complaint in which they were seeking a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief. The action arose out of the proposed construction of an extension of a road in Glastonbury. The trial court, in dismissing the complaint, ruled that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the claims should have been brought by way of an administrative appeal.

It appears from the record that all of the plaintiffs own real property on Eastbury Hill Road in Glastonbury. At the time this action was commenced, that road began at Manchester Road…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gentile v. AltermattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  2. Carpenter v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Reynolds v. VroomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  4. Connecticut Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. JacksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  5. LaCroix v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cummings v. TrippSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Owner-Operators Independent Drivers Ass'n of America v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Heritage Village Master Ass'n v. Heritage Village Water Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. Caltabiano v. PhillipsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  5. Raymond v. Rock Acquisition Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API