Legal Opinion
Raymond v. Rock Acquisition Ltd. Partnership
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 15, 1998No. AC 17322PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*412 Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
In this nuisance action seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief, the plaintiffs appeal from the judgment rendered by the trial court upon granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly (1) dismissed the action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, (2) dismissed the action where a motion to strike was appropriate, (3) dismissed the action against the defendant Dyno New England, Inc., and (4) denied the plaintiffs’ motion for recusal. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Cummings v. TrippSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Connecticut Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. JacksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Fitzgerald v. Merard Holding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Elm Street Builders, Inc. v. Enterprise Park Condominium Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. BarnettConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Kelley v. TomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Merchant v. State Ethics CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- State v. SpiegelmannConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.