Hammond v. Du Bois
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. (Gobteb, J.) The faets are stated in the opinion of the Court. The cause was argued before Boy», C. J.. Bbjscoe, B»tb.ke, Thomas, Patttson, Ubneb, Stockbbidoe and Constable, JJ.
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
On the 6th of June, 1907, Willard D. Doremus, Addison G. Du Bois and others, of Washington, D. C-, parties of the first part, entered into a contract with John P. Miller, of Virginia, party of the second part, which recites : “That whereas the said parties of the first part are the ownersi for the United States of the entire right, title and interest in a certain invention of said Doremus, being an improvement in cotton ginning machinery for which application for letters patent of the United States was filed in the United States Patent Office, May 17, 1907, by said Doremus, and whereas said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Travis v. . Knox Terpezone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Merchants' National Bank v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
- Baltimore Marine Insurance v. DalrympleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
- Manning v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
- Dietus v. FussCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
3Cited by13 opinions
- Myers v. ShipleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
- Maryland Lumber Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Darcars Motors of Silver Spring, Inc. v. BorzymCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Western Maryland Dairy, Inc. v. Maryland Wrecking & Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
- Emmert v. United Bank and Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.