Legal Opinion
Soda v. Marriott
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 24, 1933No. Docket No. 4763PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from an order granting respondent’s motion for relief under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure and allowing respondent to file a cost bill after the thirtieth day provided for by section 1034 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
It is agreed that respondent was entitled to costs had the cost bill been filed within the proper time. Likewise, it is undisputed that the cost bill was not filed within the statutory period provided by section 1034 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It was filed some twenty-four days late.
The appeal presents two questions: First,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Shearman v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Dow v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Holmes v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Redding Gold & Copper Mining Co. v. National Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912
- California National Bank v. El Dorado Lime & Minerals Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Elston v. City of TurlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Maynard v. BrandonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Flores v. Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Cornell University Medical College v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.