Legal Opinion

Sizemore v. Kulongoski

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1995No. SC S42548PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*231VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

This is an original proceeding in which petitioner seeks review of a ballot title certified by the Attorney General.1 Petitioner is entitled to bring this proceeding because he is an elector who timely submitted written comments about the Attorney General’s draft ballot title. We review the Attorney General’s ballot title for substantial compliance with ORS 250.035. ORS 250.085(5); see, e.g., Hand v. Roberts, 309 Or 430, 433, 788 P2d 446 (1990) (explaining statutory standards for substantial compliance review).

This is the first ballot title proceeding under the 1995…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Greene v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Elvin v. Oregon Public Employes UnionOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Hand v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Dale v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Crumpton v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Ascher v. KULONGOSKI (ELECTIONS DIV. 46)Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Caruthers v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Sizemore v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Dirks v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Adams v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API