Legal Opinion

State v. . McRae

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1897PublishedCited by 17 opinions

INdiotmbNT for larceny, tried before Norwood, J., at Spring Term, 1897, of Union Superior Court. The defendant was convicted and appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Eaikoloth, C. J.:

The defendam stands indicted for stealing $30 in money, and the case shows that it was a twenty dollar gold coin, the property of Edwin Eubanks. There was no direct evidence, and the State relies on the proof of recent possession. Many attempts have been made to tell what constitutes. recent possession, such as “soon after,” “shortly after,”“so soon after the theft as to raise a presumption of guilt” and the like; and then presumptions are held to be strong, slight or weak, &c., and each case is at last disposed of on its particular facts.

Ye have no disposition to try to add…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. . PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  2. State v. . GravesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  3. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1842
  4. State v. . RightsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  5. State v. . JennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. . HolbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. State v. . BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. State v. . RecordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. State v. Hullen.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. State v. . NevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API