State v. . Jennett
Supreme Court of North Carolina
IkdictmeNT for a larceny tried at Fall Term, 1882, of Washington Superior Court, before Gilliam, J.
1Opinion of the CourtAshe, J.
The “case on appeal” is so imperfect, that, in order to arrive at the facts, we are under the necessity of relying on conjecture, rather than upon His Honor’s statement. Supposing that it was a case of clerical misprision, a certiorari was sent down for a more perfect record, but the same statement is returned to us.
The statement shows that on the 31st of January, 1881, the prosecutor, Davenport, “had a black dress-coat stolen from him in Plymouth, and that on the-day of August, 1882.” “That it was made by a merchant-tailor to order; that the defendant lived in the town and was often in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. . RightsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. . HolbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. . RecordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- State v. Hullen.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- State v. . NevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- State v. . McRaeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.