Legal Opinion

People v. One Mechanical Device

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 9, 1956No. Gen. 10,864PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cbow

On July 9,1954 the State’s Attorney for Bock Island County petitioned the Circuit Court requesting an order directing him to destroy a certain pinball machine. The petition stated that the machine had been seized by a police officer and turned over to the State’s Attorney, and that it was a device upon which money is staked, hazarded, bet, won, or lost, and was manufactured and made for the purpose of gambling uses and had no other lawful purpose, and was subject to seizure and destruction as the law provides for gambling devices.

Subsequent to the filing of the petition certain persons moved…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Doubler v. DoublerIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. People v. One Pinball Machine Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  3. People Ex Rel. Roan v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  4. State Ex Rel. Dussault v. KilburnMontana Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Steely v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. TINDER, PROS. ATTY. v. Music Op. Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1957
  2. United States v. Walter KorpanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
  3. City of Chicago v. WestphalenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  4. Ratley v. BatchelorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  5. City of Chicago v. Elmhurst National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API