Legal Opinion

Skidmore Energy, Inc. v. Maxus (U.S.) Exploration Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided July 12, 2011No. 05-09-00402-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion By

Justice FILLMORE.

In a single issue, appellants Skidmore Energy, Inc. (Skidmore), and Johnny L. Patton, Jr., Patton Production Company, and Puls, Taylor & Woodson, L.L.P. (collectively referred to as Intervenors) contend the trial court erred by entering a judgment confirming an arbitration award that ordered appellants take nothing from appellee Maxus (U.S.) Exploration Company (Maxus). We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Background

Skidmore and Maxus are oil and gas exploration companies. Maxus is a subsidiary of Repsol YPF. In 1996, Maxus and Skidmore executed a written…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. McGalliard v. KuhlmannTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. HOLY CROSS CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST v. WolfTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Prudential Securities Inc. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cambridge Legacy Group, Inc. v. Ravi Jain, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
  2. Forest Oil Corp. v. El Rucio Land & Cattle Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2014
  3. Brian Caress v. Michael Fortier, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019
  4. In re M.W.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. Ponderosa Pine Energy, LLC v. Tenaska Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API