Legal Opinion
Ponderosa Pine Energy, LLC v. Tenaska Energy, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided August 20, 2012No. 05-10-00516-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion By
Justice LANG.
Ponderosa Pine Energy, LLC, appeals the trial court’s order vacating a $125 million arbitration award in its favor on the ground of one arbitrator’s evident partiality. In a single issue, Ponderosa contends the trial court’s ruling is error because the arbitrator disclosed relationships with the parties and their counsel sufficient to put appellees on notice of the facts giving rise to what they now contend is a reasonable possibility of partiality and, despite having the opportunity, appellees did not object or seek additional information about those…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Prudential Securities Inc. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- CVN Group, Inc. v. DelgadoTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Merit Insurance Company v. Leatherby Insurance Company A/K/A Western Employers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ponderosa Pine Energy, LLC, Nixon Peabody, LLP, and Shannon, Gracey, Ratliff & Miller, LLP v. Illinova Generating Company N/K/A Illinova Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
- Tenaska Energy, Inc., Tenaska Energy Holdings, LLC, Tenaska Cleburne, LLC, Continental Energy Services, Inc., And Illinova Generating Company v. Ponderosa Pine Energy, LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2014