Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Department of Labor & Industries
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 5, 1949No. 30652PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
In the early part of 1944, the respondent and several others were partners in. what was designated as a salvage operation on logged-off lands. One of the partners, Roy Dickinson, was injured, and filed a claim with the department of labor and industries. A hearing on that claim was held at Concrete, Washington, on September 27, 1944, before E. J. Cummins, an examiner for the joint board of the department, which was attended by F. I. Bradshaw, auditor of the department of labor and industries, and A. B. Wise-man, district supervisor from the department’s Mount Vernon office.
It is conceded…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- D'Amico v. ConguistaWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Ames v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Sandahl v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Stolp v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Hastings v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Kingery v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Kingery v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Department of Labor & Industries v. FankhauserWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- City of Bellevue v. RaumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- White v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1956
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.