Legal Opinion
Under Sea Industries, Inc. v. Dacor Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 13, 1987No. 87-1137, 87-1254PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.
These are consolidated appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, holding that the appellee’s patent was valid, enforceable, and infringed. We affirm in one appeal and dismiss the other appeal.
I
A. The pertinent facts are set forth in the district court’s written findings. See part II below.
The patent (No. 4,278,080) (the ’080 patent), issued to Joseph N. Schuch and assigned by him to the appellee Under Sea Industries, Incorporated (Under Sea), discloses a snorkel that is more easily purged of water following a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Envirotech Corporation v. Al George, Incorporated and Monosep, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. David Geoffrey & Associates D/B/A Slazenger, and Dunlop Slazenger Corporation AKA Dunlop Sports CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Medtronic, Inc. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Halliburton Company v. Schlumberger Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Mathis v. SpearsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.