Legal Opinion

Bateman v. Butler

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1890No. 14,116PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The questions which require consideration arise on the special verdict. The facts contained in the special verdict, so far as they relate to the issue joined between the appellant and the appellee Thrift, are, in substance, these: In April, 1883, John M. Bateman, his wife, Sarah A. Bateman, and his son, Aden Bateman, lived upon a parcel of land containing about three acres near the town of [North Salem, in Hendricks county, belonging to Lindley L. Thrift. There was a flouring mill on the land, and the entire property was purchased by John M. Bateman. The consideration which John M. Bateman…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McDill v. GunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Josselyn v. EdwardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Wolke v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Turpie v. LoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Windell v. HudsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lowe v. TurpieIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Stanton v. KenrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Federal Life Insurance v. BarnettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Boruff v. HudsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Fisk v. ReserSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API