Hadley v. Cody Hindman Logging
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board. The Board ruled that SAIF Corporation had correctly computed the amount of temporary total disability (TTD) owed claimant following his compensable injury. Claimant disagrees and assigns error to the Board’s interpretation of the phrase “extended gap” in OAR 436-60-025(5)(a). We reverse and remand for reconsideration.
The facts are not in dispute. Claimant is a logger who began working for employer in November 1993. Both claimant and employer contemplated that layoffs during the winter season were likely because of inclement…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. AshleyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- England v. Thunderbird & Saif Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Booth v. Tektronix, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Harrison v. Taylor Lumber & Treating, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3Cited by8 opinions
- SAIF Corp. v. FitzsimmonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- SAIF Corp. v. FriasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Schultz v. Springfield Forest ProductsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- State Farm Insurance v. LydaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Poland v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.