Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Fitzsimmons

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 7, 1999No. 96-08824; CA A101755PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Insurer and employer seek review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order in which the Board increased claimant’s rate of temporary disability compensation. We review for errors of law, ORS 656.298(7), and affirm.

Claimant injured his elbow and filed a workers’ compensation claim with his employer. After an initial denial, insurer accepted the claim and paid claimant temporary disability compensation based on a 52-week average wage of $247.67. Thereafter, insurer issued a notice of closure, and claimant requested reconsideration on several issues but did not specifically raise the issue of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Abu-Adas v. Employment Department, Food Employers, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Hadley v. Cody Hindman LoggingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Venetucci v. MetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GamblinUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. SmedleyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  3. SAIF Corp. v. FriasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Garcia v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API