Legal Opinion

State Farm Insurance v. Lyda

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 11, 1997No. 95-13520; CA A94571PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

Insurer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) holding that, pursuant to former OAR 436-60-025(5)(j), the Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services (director) correctly calculated the rate of claimant’s temporary total disability (TTD) based on his assumed annual wage of $18,000.1 Insurer contends that the rule impermissibly deviates from the requirement of ORS 656.210(2)(c) that TTD benefits be based on the wage at the time of injury. We review to determine if the Board’s interpretation of an inexact term is consistent with the statute, England…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. England v. Thunderbird & Saif Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Kessler v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Hadley v. Cody Hindman LoggingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. SAIF Corp. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Poland v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API