Legal Opinion
MacLachlan v. ExxonMobil Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 20, 2003No. 02-31249PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
The six named plaintiffs, all workers who formerly performed services for Mobil Corporation while on the payroll of third-party companies, filed this class action complaint seeking retroactive employment benefits from ExxonMobil Corporation and other defendants (hereinafter collectively “Mobil”), after the merger of Mobil Corporation and Exxon Corporation, pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. The district court granted summary judgment for Mobil. Finding no error, we affirm.
I
Like many…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Daniels v. City of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Vilma Lissette Vega Jose Vega v. National Life Insurance Services, Inc., Pan-American Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Performance Autoplex II Ltd. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Ellis v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. of BostonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Holland v. International Paper Co. Retirement PlanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Charlene H. Salge v. Edna Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Crowell v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- High v. E-Systems Inc LongCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.