Legal Opinion

Performance Autoplex II Ltd. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 19, 2003No. 01-51135PublishedCited by 123 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs-Appellants Performance Auto-plex II Ltd. and Performance Ford, L.P. filed suit against Defendant-Appellee Mid-Continent Casualty Company, alleging that Mid-Continent improperly refused to pay for employee dishonesty losses covered by one of its insurance policies. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Mid-Continent on all claims and Performance Autoplex and Performance Ford appeal. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

A. Facts

Performance Automotive Group, Inc. (“Performance Group”) operates new car dealerships in Texas…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. St. Paul Reinsurance Company, Ltd. v. Larry GreenbergCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  4. Daniels v. City of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  5. Gerry M. Griggs v. State Farm Lloyds Lark P. BlumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by123 opinions

  1. Ackel v. National Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  2. William Bayle v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  3. Wiley v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  4. Connors v. GravesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  5. Martin v. Alamo Community College DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API