Legal Opinion

Moore v. State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1994No. S-5324PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALEXANDER 0. BRYNER, Justice,

pro tern.

This appeal calls upon us to decide whether the merit principle of employment embodied in article XII, section 6 of the Alaska Constitution forbids state agencies from seeking to reduce public spending by “privatizing” state jobs — that is, by eliminating positions on the state workforce in favor of lower cost private contracts for the same services.

I. BACKGROUND

The facts are not disputed. The State of Alaska, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (DOT), owns and operates 219 rural airports, including the Tanana Airport. The Tanana…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Colorado Ass'n of Public Employees v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. Eidelson v. ArcherAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Walt v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Beard v. BaumAlaska Supreme Court · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Konno v. County of Hawai'iHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Native Village of Elim v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Professional Engineers v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Vermont State Employees' Ass'n v. Vermont Criminal Justice Training CouncilSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  5. Edwards v. Alaska Pulp Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API