Legal Opinion

Konno v. County of Hawai'i

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1997No. 18203, 18236PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAMIL, Justice.

The central issue addressed in these cases 1 is the privatization of public services. The United Public Workers and its officers (collectively the UPW) challenge the validity of a contract entered into by the County of Hawai'i (the County) to privatize the operation of a landfill at Pu'uanahulu on the island of Hawai'i. In No. 18203, the UPW argues that the County violated civil service laws and merit principles by privatizing the landfill worker positions in question. In No. 18236, the UPW argues that the County violated collective bargaining laws by privatizing without…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. ToyomuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Richardson v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Hulsman v. Hemmeter Development Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Hawaii Community Federal Credit Union v. KekaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Korean Buddhist Dae Won Sa Temple v. SullivanHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Dairy Road Partners v. Island Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Shoppe v. Gucci America, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API