Legal Opinion

Pack v. McCoy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1960No. 315PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.

The plaintiff contends the plea of res judicata shows on its face that it is not a defense to the matters and things alleged in his complaint for that it fails to aver that he was served; with summons, participated in the action, appeared or authorized any attorney to appear for him, had knowledge of the prior suit, or authorized anyone to consent to the judgment.

At this stage of the cause we are concerned with allegations only-— not with proof. For the purposes of the motion to strike, we must accept as true the allegations of the further defense. Trust Co. v. Currin, 244, N.C. 102, 92 S.E.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Penn Dixie Lines, Inc. v. GrannickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Mercer v. HilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Stone v. Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Lumberton Coach Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. CurrinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Parnell v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Taylor v. Tri-County Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Ordway v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  4. Hunt v. CranfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Hunt v. CranfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API