Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hunt v. Cranford

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 23, 1960Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Paeker and Bobbitt, JJ.,

concurring in part and dissenting in part. We concur in the award of a new trial for error in the charge but are of the opinion that, for reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion in Pack v. McCoy, 251 N.C. 590, 593, 112 S.E. 2d 118, the court properly denied defendant’s motion for leave to plead the judgment in the Summey case as res judicata.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pack v. McCoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960