Legal Opinion

Mull v. Allen

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 19, 1947No. 15762PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wyatt, Justice.

1. This case turns on the quoted description contained in the plaintiff’s deed. We may concede, as is urged by counsel for the plaintiff, that the evidence was sufficient to show that the tract of land sued for is embraced within the land purportedly conveyed by the plaintiff’s deed. Still we think the plaintiff’s evidence insufficient to show title to the property in controversy, for the deed upon which he relies is void because of indefiniteness of description. “The description of the land in a deed must be sufficiently certain to afford means of identification. A deed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crawford v. VernerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Luttrell v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Andrews v. MurphySupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  4. Huntress v. PortwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gainesville Midland Railroad v. TynerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  2. Odd Fellows v. City of ThomasvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  3. Smith v. Georgia Industrial Realty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  4. Bennett v. RewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  5. Haygood v. DuncanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API