Legal Opinion

United States v. One Parcel of Property Located at 5 Reynolds Lane

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided December 3, 2012No. 3:09-cv-543 (CSH)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CHARLES S. HAIGHT, JR., Senior District Judge.

In a Ruling entered on October 3, 2012 [Doc. 44] reported at 895 F.Supp.2d 305, 2012 WL 4514490 (“Marder I ”), familiarity with which is assumed, the Court granted partial summary judgment to Plaintiff United States and held that the property located at 5 Reynolds Lane, Waterford, Connecticut, a residence owned jointly by Claimants Seth Marder and Beth Marder (“the Defendant Property”), is subject to forfeiture by the Government pursuant to the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(7), based upon a use of the Prop*133erty to facilitate a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. United States v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  3. Von Hofe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. MilbrandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. Raich v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. One Parcel of Property Located at 5 Reynolds LaneDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API