United States v. One Parcel of Property Located at 5 Reynolds Lane
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND DECISION
HAIGHT, Senior District Judge:
This is an in rem civil action wherein Plaintiff United States of America (“the Government”) seeks forfeiture of 5 Reynolds Lane, Waterford, Connecticut (“the Property”) pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(7) because the Property was used to commit, or facilitate the commission of, a violation of the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 801 et seq. (“CSA”). *350The Property is a private residence jointly owned and occupied by its Claimants, Seth Marder and Beth Marder.
The Government’s theory of the case is that it is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Von Hofe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. 6941 Morrison Drive, DenverDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2013