Legal Opinion

United States v. One Parcel of Property Located at 5 Reynolds Lane

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided July 25, 2013No. 3:09-cv-543 (CSH)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND DECISION

HAIGHT, Senior District Judge:

This is an in rem civil action wherein Plaintiff United States of America (“the Government”) seeks forfeiture of 5 Reynolds Lane, Waterford, Connecticut (“the Property”) pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(7) because the Property was used to commit, or facilitate the commission of, a violation of the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 801 et seq. (“CSA”). *350The Property is a private residence jointly owned and occupied by its Claimants, Seth Marder and Beth Marder.

The Government’s theory of the case is that it is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Von Hofe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. 6941 Morrison Drive, DenverDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API