Legal Opinion

Ringling v. Biering

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1928No. 6,292PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Galen

On motion for a rehearing the' original opinion herein is withdrawn and this one rendered and filed in substitution.

This is an action in equity, instituted by the plaintiff on November 7,’ 1925, to obtain a decree permitting him to offset a judgment which is entered against him in the sum of $323,722.90, together with accrued interest and costs (Biering v. Ringling, 74 Mont. 176, 240 Pac. 829), with promissory notes executed by the defendants Biering and Cunningham jointly and severally to the Elling Estate Company and the Elling State Bank, for the aggregate amount of $233,612.10, together…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Bordeaux v. BordeauxMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Doudell v. ShooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Howe v. Key System Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Stockton Combine Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glen's Falls Co.California Supreme Court · 1893

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Adamson v. District Court of the Fourth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Floyd v. TowndrowNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Heater v. Boston & Montana Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State Ex Rel. Bullard v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  5. In Re Day's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API