Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 1993No. 41A05-9208-PC-277PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARTEAU, Judge.

In 1981, James Smith pleaded guilty to charges of rape, a class A felony and confinement, a class B felony, for which he received concurrent sentences of fifty and twenty years. Smith's sentence was affirmed by the Indiana Supreme Court. Smith v. State (1985), Ind., 485 N.E.2d 898. By way of a petition for post-conviction relief, Smith now raises the following issues:

I. Whether he was denied effective assistance of counsel;

II. Whether the court improperly used the same factor to elevate both the rape and the confinement convictions to higher class felonies; and

III. Whether…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Bevill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Stewart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Wickliffe v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Madden v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. State v. LopezIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Odom v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Lingler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Carrington v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API