Odom v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARRARD, Judge.
Cean G. Odom, Sr. (Odom) contends that the State subjected him to double jeopardy by enhancing multiple charges against him based upon a single incident of bodily injury to the victim. Since Odom pleaded guilty to informations which were facially duplicative, he is entitled to challenge his convictions. We reverse.
FACTS
Odom pleaded guilty in 1993 to a robbery 1 and burglary2 committed on November 5, 1992. Both charges under cause number 02D04-9212-CF-686 (hereinafter "686") were enhanced to class A felonies based upon the serious bodily injury sustained by the elderly…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- White v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Flowers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Bevill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Lyles v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mapp v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Douglas v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Madden v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Channell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Harris v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.