Legal Opinion

Lakewood Metal Products, Inc. v. Capital Machine & Switch Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 17, 1967PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff instituted this action on September 16, 1964, alleging that on September 18, 1963, its employee Piorie Jacaruso was injured as a result of a fire which occurred in an electrostatic lacquer machine which had been manufactured and installed by the defendant Capital Machine and Switch Company and which utilized an electrocoating process which had been installed by the *709defendant Ransburg Electro-Coating Corporation. The complaint alleged that this injury was compensable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. General Statutes c. 568. Section 31-293 of that act authorizes an employer…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lubas v. McCuskerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Winslow v. Lewis-Shepard, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Karp v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  4. Rana v. RitaccoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. Misiurka v. Maple Hill Farms, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API