Legal Opinion

United States v. James Arthur Charlton, Franklin N. Jacek, A/K/A Frank Royce, James Francis Swartz

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 7, 1977No. 76-1454 to 76-1456PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENGEL, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by three defendants convicted of forging and counterfeiting fifty-cent postage stamps worth approximately $200,000, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 501 and 2. 1 Of the numerous grounds asserted for reversal, only one merits extended treatment. Defendant James Arthur Charlton claims that in-custody oral statements given to the government agents on the evening of his arrest were made involuntarily. We hold that Charlton’s statements, while voluntary under traditional tests, were taken in violation of the specific proscriptions of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. United States v. Walter v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Evasio Hernandez, A/k/a, Eduardo GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Norman J. Johnson v. Clarence TriggCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Brown v. HorellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Daniel John Maglio v. Arnold R. Jago, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API