Legal Opinion
Daniel John Maglio v. Arnold R. Jago, Superintendent
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 3, 1978No. 77-3331PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PECK, Circuit Judge.
Daniel Maglio, a 16-year-old runaway, was arrested while driving a car which be longed to a man who had been found dead in his apartment that morning. Maglio was taken to police headquarters for questioning, and his Miranda rights were read to him by Police Captain Traub. Traub asked Maglio if he would waive his rights and answer questions, and Maglio replied, “Maybe I should have an attorney.” Traub told Maglio he couldn’t have an attorney then, but that he would have to wait until the next day in court, when an attorney would be appointed for him. Traub told him again…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- State v. StephensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- Holland v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. GeraldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Pierre Fouche, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Mallott v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.