Legal Opinion

Nixon v. Ramsey

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1919No. Civ. No. 2826PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

WASTE, P, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment made and entered after demurrer to the complaint sustained without leave to amend.. The action was brought by the plaintiff to recover judgment against defendant, as executrix of the last will and testament of H. Ramsey, deceased, on three promissory notes made, executed, and delivered by said H. Ramsey, during his lifetime, to the First National Bank of Winnemucea, Nevada, and by said bank indorsed, signed, and delivered to the plaintiff herein.

The notes were dated respectively November 20, 1909, December 31, 1909, and July 10, 1912,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. ProsserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Powell v. PetchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Snyder v. DederichsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maurer v. BernardoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Huus v. HuusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Nixon v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1925
  4. Textile National Bank v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API